d r a f t
Good background discussion of acculturation in the context of archaeological digs at WindrosesiteorLittleRockVillagein Kankakee River Valley; Pokegon settlement on St. Joseph River north of South Bend, Ind., and Benack Village site in Marshall County, Ind. — on Tippecanoe River https://www.potawatomiwildlifepark.com/history
Elizabeth Bollwerk, ControllingAcculturation: APotawatomiStrategyforAvoidingRemoval,” MidcontinentalJournalofArchaeology,Vol.31,No.1(Spring2006),pp.117-142 https://www.academia.edu/695665/Historical_Archaeology_A_Midwestern_Case_Study_Controlling_Acculturation_A_Potawatomi_Strategy_for_Avoiding_Removal
Bollwerk of the International Center for Jefferson Studies, Monticello, (Department Member)
xxx
Overview: […] relationship between the French and many of the Potawatomi had become onealmostofcamaraderie,withtheexchangeofgoodsoftensymbolizing solidarity and the creation of bonds between the two groups (120)
xxxx
[117] The subject of Native American and European contact has been the focus ofbothanthropologicalandhistoricalresearchforanumberofyears.Early studies,however,oftenreliedsolelyonhistoricalwrittensourcesfromEuro- AmericantradersandmissionariesthatcoloredNativeAmericans’reactions in a variety of ways. The resulting historical and anthropological theories traditionallyoversimplifiedNativeAmericans’responsestoEuro-American attemptsto“civilize”thembydepictingtheirreactionsinoneoftwoways. GenerallyitwasarguedthatNativeAmericangroupseithercompletelyre- jected Euro-American culture and subsequently vanished due to removal, or that these groups assimilated all aspects of Euro-American culture into theirownwhilecompletelyabandoningtheirowntraditionsandbeliefsin ordertoavoidremoval(QuimbyandSpoehr1951).
[118-19]
butinsteadactedasselectiveconsumers,makingchoicesbasedontheirown culturalbeliefs.ThesenewstudiesdemonstratedthatmanyNativeAmerican groupswerenotpassiverecipients,butmanipulatedtheirinteractionswith Euro-AmericansandtheUnitedStatesgovernmenttoservetheirowninter- estsandavoidpressuretoassimilate.Iseektoaddtothisfacetofresearch byprovidingevidenceofoneNativeAmericangroupthatusedvarioustech- niques to avoid assimilation and relocation from their lands in the Great LakesareatotheWest.ThePotawatomioftheMichigan,Indiana,andIlli- noisregionprovideaninterestingexampleoftherangeofmeasuresutilized bydifferentgroupsinreactiontoEuro-Americancontact.
(also cites use of “savages” by champlain in 1616 on p. 119)
[119-20]
Colonialoffi- cialssenttwoFrenchtraders,Pierre-EspiritRadissonandMedartChouartde Groseillers,toWisconsinwheretheyspentseveralmonthsinaPotawatomi village.ThisvisitintroducedthePotawatomitothefurtradeandinitiated whatwastobealongtradingrelationshipbetweenthemandtheFrench.
120 ElizabethBollwerk In addition, the arrival of Jesuit missionary Father Claude Allouez to the GreenBayareainthe1660sopenedcontactbetweenthePotawatomiand Frenchmissionariesthatwouldlastforgenerationsandultimatelyleadto thereligiousconversionofmanymembersofthetribe(Edmunds1978:5). Thus, while the French created a strong bond with the Potawatomi, their agentsundoubtedlyarrivedintheregionwithdistinctgoalsandreasonsfor interactingwiththenatives.
[120-21]
he British,unliketheFrench,failedtounderstandthemannerinwhichboth theNativeAmericansandtheFrenchviewedcommodityexchange.There-
121 APotawatomiStrategyforAvoidingRemoval lationship between the French and many of the Potawatomi had become onealmostofcamaraderie,withtheexchangeofgoodsoftensymbolizing solidarity and the creation of bonds between the two groups (Edmunds 1978:75; Wagner 1998:433). English officials, however, either overlooked orchosetoignorethisimportantcomponentofthetraderelationshipand oftenfailedtooffergiftsoffriendshipandsolidaritywhentradingwiththe Potawatomiandothertribes.ThisclashofviewpointsbetweenthePotawa- tomiandtheEnglishdemonstratesthatalthoughthematerialsthePotawa- tomiwereusingintheirdailylivesmighthavechanged,theideasandbeliefs theyassociatedwiththemdidnot.Asaresult,thePotawatomiwerelessin- clinedtoabandontheFrench,whohadadoptedasimilarattitudeinregard totrade,infavoroftheBritishwhosepracticesdifferedsoradically.
[120] revulutionary war period]
The Britishdiscardedtheirpolicyofthrifttowardsnativegroups,andtheSt.Jo- sephPotawatomicametoviewtheAmericansasamoreconcertedthreatto theirlandsandwayoflife.Asaresult,thebandsofPotawatomiinMichigan came collectively to support the British crown (Edmunds 1978:100). The westernvillagesinIllinois,however,remainedsuspiciousoftheBritishand the Americans, and kept their ties with the French (Edmunds 1978:119). Thesetribaldivisionswouldendureevenasthewardrewtoaclose.These variousallianceswiththeFrenchand,eventually,theAmericanswouldplay asignificantroleindefiningthewaysinwhichdifferentgroupsofPotawa- tomireactedtoassimilationpressure.
[122-23]
Furthermore,itshouldbenotedthatthetypesofinteractionsbetween thePotawatomiandEuro-AmericansduringtheRemovalperiodrangeacross awidespectrum.Whenstudyingrelationshipsinthisregion,itiscriticalto notethatmultiplegroupsofEuro-AmericanswereinteractingwiththePo- tawatomiuntilthetimeofremoval.Thearrivalofexplorersintheearlypart oftheseventeenthcenturyopenedavenuesforfurtraders,missionaries,and eventuallygovernmentofficials.Furthermore,allofthesegroupshadsepa- rateagendasthatshapedtheirviewsandinteractionswiththePotawatomi. ThediversetypesofrelationshipsbetweenthePotawatomiandEuro-Ameri- cansmeantthatthenativegroupsthroughouttheMichigan/Indiana/Illinois regionwereexposedtoEuro-Americancultureinavarietyofwayswithvary- ingdegreesofintensity,thatcanbecharacterizedasdirectedandnondirect- edcontactsituations.WagnercontendsthatthePotawatomiwereexposed to“bothdirectedandnondirectedformsofculturecontactviathefurtrade andtheUnitedStatesgovernment-sponsoredmissionprogramrespectively” (1998:431).Withthisinmind,itshouldnotcomeasasurprisethatthere- lationshipsbetweenthePotawatomiandEuro-Americansareexpectedtobe diverseandmultifaceted.DifferentgroupswithinthePotawatomicultural frameworkhadvariousgoalsinmindwhenformingassociationswithEuro- Americanstoservetheirparticularinterests,andexhibitedvaryingdegrees ofacceptanceandresistanceduringtheirinteractions.Thesediversehistories provideevidencethat“peoplesharingthesameculturalorientationdidnot necessarilyrespondto“‘others’inaprescribed,uniformmanner”(Lightfoot et al. 1998:202). Contact relations must be studied with this principle in
123 APotawatomiStrategyforAvoidingRemoval mind,andNativeAmericansshouldbeviewedasactive,sociallymotivated consumerswhoengagedinvariousformsofcontactinordertoservetheir owninterests(Cooketal.1996:50–51). The acknowledgment of these differing interests and needs also high- lights another problematic aspect of previous acculturation studies: the tendencytocreatemodelsofso-calledtraditionalsocietiesthatareseenas lacking internal dynamism and agency. Research in recent decades, how- ever, has strived to make both archaeologists and the public conscious of thefact“thatallsocieties...alreadyhadtheirownlong,complex,dynamic historiesthatwereverymuchinmotionatthemomentofcontact”(Dietler 1998:289).
[123-4]
Given
124 ElizabethBollwerk thatthereisstrongevidenceofdiversityintheprehistoricrecord,thevary- ingreactionsofthehistoricPotawatomitowardEuropeansandtheirgoods discussedbelowisnotsurprising.Whilethesocialtransformationsincited byhistoriccontactbetweennativesandEuropeanswerecertainlyuniquein termsofthegroupsandgoodsinvolved,theyshouldberecognizedaspart of a continual process of cultural change that has roots reaching far back intoprehistory.
[125]
ThehistoryofEuro-AmericanandPotawatomirelationships,however, meantthatthedifferentvillagesthroughouttheMichigan/Indiana/Illinois region reacted to this policy with varying degrees of acceptance and resis- tance.Tensionsintheregioncontinuedtoriseduringtheopeningdecades ofthenineteenthcentury,whenitbecameapparentthatthefederalgovern- ment wanted to open more of the West for settlement. The government’s land accumulation policy was especially problematic for the Potawatomi and other tribes because of their pattern of seasonal movement. As hunt- ingandgatheringgroundsbecamemorelimited,itwasmoredifficultfor groupstoprovidefortheirvillagesandfamilies.Inanefforttoaddressthis problemandopenupmorelandforsettlement,theAmericangovernment instituteda“civilization”policy,thegoalofwhichwastoconverttheIndi- ansintopacific,yeomanfarmers,withtheendresultofcompletelyassimi- latingNativeAmericansintoEuro-Americancultureandcedingsurplusland totheUnitedStatesgovernment(Secundaetal.2002:33).
[126 ]
UnderthetermsoftheCareyMissionTreaty ofSeptember20,1828andtheChicagoTreatyof1833,thePotawatomief- fectivelysurrenderedthemajorityoftheirlandstothefederalgovernment inexchangeforgoodsandannuities.ThelattertreatygavethePotawatomi three years to vacate their lands, but when some groups refused to move, theywereforcedtodoso.In1838,themajorityofthePotawatomiinthe Indiana/Michigan area were removed to a reservation in Kansas, traveling alongwhatwouldcometobeknownastheTrailofDeath. CommoditiesinPerspective BytheoutsetoftheRemovalPeriod,thePotawatomithroughouttheGreat Lakes had been using items of European manufacture for over a century. Thus, regardless of differing interactions with Euro-American groups, the consistentpresenceofcommoditiessuchasironkettles,glassbeads,andre- finedearthenwarewithinarchaeologicalassemblagesofPotawatomisitesis notsurprising.Furthermore,itislikelythattheseitemstendedtomaintain similar utilitarian functions like those of the native-manufactured goods they were chosen to replace.
[125]
ThehistoryofEuro-AmericanandPotawatomirelationships,however, meantthatthedifferentvillagesthroughouttheMichigan/Indiana/Illinois region reacted to this policy with varying degrees of acceptance and resis- tance.Tensionsintheregioncontinuedtoriseduringtheopeningdecades ofthenineteenthcentury,whenitbecameapparentthatthefederalgovern- ment wanted to open more of the West for settlement. The government’s land accumulation policy was especially problematic for the Potawatomi and other tribes because of their pattern of seasonal movement. As hunt- ingandgatheringgroundsbecamemorelimited,itwasmoredifficultfor groupstoprovidefortheirvillagesandfamilies.Inanefforttoaddressthis problemandopenupmorelandforsettlement,theAmericangovernment instituteda“civilization”policy,thegoalofwhichwastoconverttheIndi- ansintopacific,yeomanfarmers,withtheendresultofcompletelyassimi- latingNativeAmericansintoEuro-Americancultureandcedingsurplusland totheUnitedStatesgovernment(Secundaetal.2002:33).
[126-7]
WindrosesiteorLittleRockVillage(11KA326),whichwaslocatedin the Kankakee River Valley in northeastern Illinois, represents the remains
127 APotawatomiStrategyforAvoidingRemoval ofanoutlyinghomesteadofaPotawatomisummervillageoccupiedinthe late1820sandearly1830s(Wagner1998:445).Theassemblagefromthis sitecontainsbothEuropeanandnative-manufactureditems.Thecollection, however,isuniqueinthatEuro-Americanitems,suchasrefinedearthenware dishes,domesticatedanimalremains,silverdecorativeitems,andwindow glass, compose less than five percent of the excavated artifact assemblage fromthesite(Wagner1998:446).
[129]
ThePokagonVillagesite(20BE13)islocatedinBerrienCounty,Michigan, aboutsixmilesnorthandwestofthepresentcityofSouthBend,Indiana. This site represents the remains of the homestead of Chief Leopold Po- kagonandhisband,whoinhabitedtheareafromapproximately1821to 1837.Landsurveyors’reportsfromthe1830sgivethelocationofPokagon’s cabin and indicate the presence of a Roman Catholic “church, school, or missionhouse.”Missionaryrecordsindicatethatthevillagealsowascom- prisedofanumberoftraditionalwigwamsmadeof“flags[and]circular[in shape],abouttenfeetindiameterandsevenfeethighinthecenter”(McCoy 1840:139).
[130]
Schurr et al.’s (this volume) study of the re- mainsrecoveredfromthePokagonsiteindicatesthatdomesticatedanimals played an important role in the village’s subsistence patterns. Unlike the Windrosesite,cattle,swine,andotherdomesticatesmadeupasignificant proportion,or13percentofthetotalbiomassfromPokagon’sVillage.In contrast,domesticatedanimalremains(swineandsheep)comprisedonly .01percentoftheassemblagefromtheWindrosesite;thebalanceisalmost entirely wild animal remains. Martin has argued that the lack of domes- ticated faunal remains at the Windrose site demonstrates that the village “retainedaconservativeeconomicorientation”andresistedtheintegration of domesticated animals provided by the government (Martin 2001:163). Pokagonandhispeople,however,apparentlyusedacombinationofwild and domesticated animals in order to persuade the government that they shouldremaininthearea(Schurretal.thisvolume). OneoftheEuro-AmericanartifactsuncoveredfromPokagon’sVillage thatstandsinstarkcontrasttothoseuncoveredduringinvestigationsatthe WindrosesiteisaSt.Benedictmedal(Figure1).Whetherthismedal,which features an image of St. Benedict on the front and a cross surrounded by letteringontheback,belongedtooneofthemembersoftheband,oreven Pokagonhimselfisunclear;however,itisnonethelessastrongindicationof thepresenceofCatholicmissionariesinthearea.Furthermore,itshouldbe noted that Catholic missionaries were not brought in by the government, butratherwereinvitedtoliveinthevillagebyPokagon.Thisrequestisitself somewhat unusual, but what is even more interesting is the fact that Po- kagonspecificallyrequestedaCatholicpriest,eventhoughmissionariesof otherfaithswerealreadypresentintheSt.JosephValleyarea.
[
PokagonknewthatacceptingaidfromtheBaptistsorshowingsupportof theirmissionaryeffortswouldsuggestthatheandhispeoplewereaccept- ingthepolicyofremoval,forasThomasargues,themeaningsof“objects are never quite separated from the men who exchange them” (1991:16). WhilePokagonrefusedtoviewEuro-Americancommoditiesexclusivelyas ameansthroughwhichhispeoples’culturewasbeingdestroyed,herecog- nized that accepting these items from certain people could have negative consequences.PokagonthereforerefusedtoassociatewiththeBaptistsand never allowed members of his band to send their children to the school maintainedbytheBaptistmission. Moreover,Pokagoncontinuedtoaskfora“blackrobe”forhispeople (Buechner1933:297).Althoughthisdesirewasasignofhisfaith,itlikely wasalsoademonstrationofhispoliticalinsight.Variousresearchershave sincediscoveredthatduringtheyearsMcCoywaspreachingtothePotawato- mi,hekeptmoneygiventohimbythefederalgovernmentthatwasactually intendedtobespentonannuitiesfortheNativeAmericans(Secundaetal. 2002;Smith1833).WhetherPokagonknewofMcCoy’sactionsisuncertain, buthenonethelesswasunhappyenoughwiththeReverendtotakeaction in1830.ThatyearPokagontraveledtoDetroittoappealtothebishopfora “blackrobe”forhisvillage(Baroux1913:32).InAugustof1830,aRoman Catholicpriest,FatherStephenBadin,wassentinresponsetohisrequest. Evidence of Father Badin’s presence on the site was recovered in the springof2000,whenSchurrandhisstudentsexcavatedthefoundationof Figure1.St.Benedict medallionfront(left)and back(right),fromPokagon’s Cabinmidden(20BE13).
[134]
Although both historical documents and archaeology were used to inves- tigate the previous sites, the Benack Village site (12MR231) provides an exampleofthecriticalrolethisdualapproachplaysinuncoveringthecom- prehensivehistoryofasite.InvestigationsatBenack’sVillagewereconduct- edbytheNotreDameArchaeologicalFieldSchoolduringthesummersof 1998through2001(Schurr2001).Althoughexcavationsuncoveredthecab- inareathoughttobeBenack’sresidence,intactfeatureswerenotfoundand arethoughttohavebeendestroyedbybulldozingintheareathatoccurred about 30 years earlier (Schurr 1997). As a result, analyses focused on the cabinareamiddenassemblagewhich,unliketheitemsfoundatPokagon’s village and the Windrose site, consisted entirely of Euro-American manu- factureditems.
132 ElizabethBollwerk themissionarycabininhabitedbytheCatholicfathersduringtheirtimeat Pokagon Village (Schurr 2000). Although no artifacts were found, letters writtenbyFatherBadinindicatethatthecabinwasusedforservicesandas his residence during his time at Pokagon Village (Badin 1832). Although Catholic missionaries arrived with the intent of acculturating the Potawa- tomi,itcanbearguedtheirlaborsactuallygavethebandameanstoescape assimilationandremoval.FatherBadinandothermissionariesplayedakey rolebyeducatingPokagonbandmembersabouttheaspectsofEuro-Ameri- canculturethatwouldhelpthemcreateaself-sufficientvillage.Mostimpor- tantly,thesemissionarieslaboredwiththePotawatomi.Forexample,Father Badin’slettersrefertohisteachingthePokagonvillagershowtofarmusinga Euro-Americanplow(Badin1832:311).Untilthispoint,Potawatomifarm- inghadbeenlimitedtothecultivationofsmallplotsimmediatelyoutside theirhomesthatweretendedexclusivelybythewomen.However,withFa- therBadin’sassistance,thevillagersreportedlywereabletogrowmorecorn thantheirneighborsdidthefollowingyear(Badin1832:311).Moreover,Fa- therBadinandotherCatholicfathersoftentriedtofighttheremovalpolicy, arguingthatitwouldonlybedetrimentaltotheNativeAmericans(Badin 1832:312). It therefore appears that by inviting the Catholic missionaries intohisvillage,Pokagonactuallygainedalliesinhisfightagainstremoval. TheremainsofFatherBadin’schapelandtheSt.Benedictmedalpoint to a strong Catholic presence at Pokagon’s Village, and it is arguable that this presence played a large role in helping the Pokagon band remain in theMichiganarea.
[135]
In1834,Benack’svillageisdescribedasconsistingofacabinsurround- edbywigwams(Smith1954).InMarchof1839,anothervisittoBenack’s Villageisrecorded.Atthistime,thevillagewassaidtoconsistofabout50In- dianslivingonalargetractoflandsurroundingagoodhousethatwaswell furnished. The account mentions that the house was apparently presided overbyMaryAnn,Benack’sdaughter,whohadbeeneducatedinaCatholic schoolinSt.Louisanddressedin“whitestyle”(Schurr1997).
Select references
- Clifton,JamesA. 1977 ThePrairiePeople.RegentsPressofKansas,Lawrence.
- Cusick,JamesG. 1998 HistoriographyofAcculturation:AnEvaluationofConceptsandtheirAp- plicationinArchaeology.InStudiesinCultureContact,editedbyJ.Cusick, pp.126–145.SouthernIllinoisUniversityPress,Carbondale.
- Pokagon’s Cabin 2000. Electronic document, http://www.nd.edu/ ~mschurr/cabin2000.html,accessedMarch20,2004.UniversityofNotre Dame,DepartmentofAnthropology.
- Pokagon’s Cabin 2001. Electronic document, http://www.nd.edu/~mschurr/cabin2001.html,accessedMarch20,2004.UniversityofNotre Dame,DepartmentofAnthropology.
- NotreDameArchaeologicalFieldSchoolInvestigations.Electronicdocu- ment, http://www.nd.edu/~mschurr/Removal_Project.html, accessed De- cember 14, 2004. University of Notre Dame, Department of Anthropol- ogy.
- Secunda,WilliamB.,MarkR.Schurr,andMichellePribbernow 2002 Investigations of Historic Potawatomi Village Sites in Northern Indiana. Ar- chaeologyLaboratory,DepartmentofAnthropology,UniversityofNotre Dame,ReportsofInvestigations2002–1.NotreDame,Indiana.
- Wagner,MarkJ. 1998 CulturalChangeandContinuityAmongtheEarlyNineteenth-CenturyPo- tawatomi.In StudiesinCultureContact,editedbyJ.Cusick,pp.430–451. SouthernIllinoisUniversityPress,Carbondale.
[Uplinked Dec. 6, 2025]